When is your current IT vendor no longer effective?

IT projects rarely fail because the technology is “bad”. Much more often, they fail because development does not serve the real business goal — or because it is not under proper control.

If several of the questions below sound familiar, it may be worth pausing for a moment.

These are not theoretical problems. Most of our engagements start in exactly these situations.

Development is progressing, but it is hard to tell exactly where things stand and what the tangible outcome will be.
Developers speak in “technical language”, while business decisions are made on a completely different basis.
Deadlines keep slipping, yet there is no clear reason or accountable owner.
The system works, but no one dares to say it is actually well designed.
If a key person becomes unavailable, the project or system becomes fragile and difficult to hand over — a classic vendor lock-in problem.
It is difficult to determine what real business value the investment so far has produced.

These signs do not necessarily indicate bad intent. Much more often, they point to a missing structured connection between development and business objectives — something that is essential for long-term stability.

SIXG Technology was founded to address exactly this problem. We do not act as mere executors, but as thinking partners: we translate business intent into engineering decisions and take personal responsibility for the outcome.

Why SIXG Technology is likely to be more effective

The cost of IT development is primarily not a technological issue, but an organizational and decision-making one. Achieving the same result with fewer resources leads directly to lower costs.

The SIXG Technology methodology is built on this principle: we do not work with more developers, but with fewer unnecessary steps .

Fewer resources → lower cost.
When a solution does exactly what is truly required, there is no overengineering and no costly redesign later. This means fewer development hours and fewer fixes.

Well-structured processes → less coordination.
When decisions, responsibilities, and goals are clear, there is no need for endless alignment cycles, repeated meetings, or changes caused by misunderstandings. Time not spent on coordination is money saved.

Transparent operation → lower business risk.
When development is predictable, measurable, and traceable, risks do not appear only at the end. This results in a safer and financially more defensible operation.

Together, these do not promise faster development, but more meaningful development. And in the long run, that is what truly saves money.

Not sure if your current approach is the best one?

In a short conversation, we help you gain clarity — without obligation and without technical smoke screens.

Let’s discuss it